It is best suited to outdoor activities that require higher levels of exertion and extra breathability is required to help keep you comfortable. The pullover offers a technical fit that provides comfort and breathability whether you are wearing it as a mid-layer or a standalone top. The Patagonia pullover is a simple, adaptable, and versatile fleece. This allows you a good amount of choice when it comes to picking not only the best weight of fleece but also the best style of fleece to suit your outdoor requirements. Types of Fleeces:īoth the R1 and the R2 range of fleeces offer different variations. This makes R2 thicker, heavier, and less breathable than its R1 counterpart. Patagonia R1 uses 100wt fleece whereas Patagonia R2 uses 200wt fleece. In simple terms, the higher the weight of the fleece, the thicker and heavier it will be. When it comes to the grade of fleece, the weight (wt) of the material used in the construction of each item of clothing makes a big difference to the overall performance of the fleece. This increases the amount of warmth the fleece offers the wearer. The R2 is constructed using thicker fleece material and the power grid technology is only on the sides. This allows for high levels of breathability while you are wearing it. For example, the R1 is made with cross-weave power grid technology that covers most of the fleece. That doesn’t mean to say that the R1 won’t keep you warm, it’s just that the R1 and R2 are constructed slightly differently to aid different elements of outdoor life. The biggest difference between Patagonia R1 and R2 is that the R2 is a heavier and warmer fleece compared to the R1. R2 is made using thicker fleece material and the power grid technology is only on the sides so that it increases the amount of warmth it offers. So the R2 is a heavier and warmer fleece, while the R1 is a lighter weight garment. It's interesting, I've seen the durability debated on here before, with wildly different experiences claimed.Quick summary: The name R2 signifies it is made from 200 wt classic Polartec fleece, whereas the R1 is made from 100 wt fabric. Though not sure how I'd get my Nitro in contact with either of those. Can only think of the pieces on my shoe heels for the Dirty Gurl Gaiters, and on the XMid vents. Though didn't have any velcro I recall in my clothing/gear. Though I'm sure there were unseen "microfibres" as in any fabric. I also hand washed my Nitro in light coloured campsite/hotel sinks at least 4 times. ( And my partner will tell you that I'm annoyingly observant/pedantic about things like this that most people aren't interested in!) I often noticed down from our sleeping bag/quilt as well as other debris and human hair etc but never noticed any blue fibres from my Nitro. Each morning when I packed the tent, I usually shook the floor down and emptied crumbs etc. Pulled in and out of pack/stuffsac/pillow bag in tent. Often worn for sleeping in on colder nights as well as on days when needed. Given Polartec have long made efforts at appearing to be green, and knowledge of microfibres shedding has been around longer than Alpha, I would hope they'd not be pushing a fabric on the market that sheds a magnitude more microfibres than a standard microfleece? Not saying I don't believe that Alpha doesn't shed fibres like any other fleece, just that ours don't obviously regularly shed visible fibres in any excess manner, which is what you imply (and obviously experience)? What I mean is that I don't find they obviously shed "just looking at them" But that isn't what we were discussing as such.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |